<listing id="l9bhj"><var id="l9bhj"></var></listing>
<var id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></var>
<menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></cite>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></cite>
<var id="l9bhj"></var><cite id="l9bhj"><video id="l9bhj"></video></cite>
<menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"><listing id="l9bhj"></listing></strike></cite><cite id="l9bhj"><span id="l9bhj"><menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem></span></cite>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></var>
<ins id="l9bhj"><span id="l9bhj"></span></ins>
Volume 45 Issue 11
Nov.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
MIAO Haibin, XIANG Chaojian, LIU Shengnan, HUANG Dongnan, LOU Huafen. Application of expert-augmented machine learning modeling in high-strength and high-conductivity copper alloy development[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2023, 45(11): 1908-1917. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2022.09.19.002
Citation: MIAO Haibin, XIANG Chaojian, LIU Shengnan, HUANG Dongnan, LOU Huafen. Application of expert-augmented machine learning modeling in high-strength and high-conductivity copper alloy development[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2023, 45(11): 1908-1917. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2022.09.19.002

Application of expert-augmented machine learning modeling in high-strength and high-conductivity copper alloy development

doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2022.09.19.002
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: louhuafen@cmari.com
  • Received Date: 2022-09-19
    Available Online: 2023-03-01
  • Publish Date: 2023-11-01
  • Investigation into material data is frequently limited by small sample sizes, high noise levels, complex associations, high dimensionality, and the need for expert knowledge. To improve the effectiveness of machine learning modeling, incorporating expert knowledge is necessary. In this study, we assembled a dataset including 410 data points containing composition, condition, and property data, in which the state symbols of the copper alloy were recoded using the one-hot encoding method. Because of the substantial capacity of neural network algorithms for powerful nonlinear fitting, we employed these algorithms for modeling. The network structures of the strength and conductivity models were optimized to 21–55–70–1 and 21–50–65–1, respectively. After optimizing the network structure, expert knowledge was integrated into the neural network loss function. This approach quantitatively describes the strength of the monotonic relations between the status factors of components and performance by calculating the rank correlation coefficient between the independent and dependent variables. During model training, the rank correlation coefficient was incorporated into the neural network loss function to assess the similarity between the model output and expert knowledge in real-time. For instance, the relation in which strength increases with the hardening level was quantitatively expressed with a Spearman score, and these Spearman scores were added to the loss function. A machine learning model augmented by expert knowledge was trained using genetic algorithm-based optimization of network weights. After updating each network weight, orthogonal data were generated to evaluate the consistency between output data and expert knowledge. The Spearman correlation coefficients between the model input–output data and expert knowledge exceeded 0.98, and the R2 scores of the strength and conductivity models achieved on the test set were >0.90. Multiobjective optimization based on composition, condition, strength, and conductivity models was conducted using a genetic algorithm, and Pareto-optimal solutions were obtained and experimentally validated after 100 generations of iteration. Three sets of components were selected from the Pareto-optimal solutions and were empirically tested for validation. The results showed that the tensile strength had reached 637 MPa, while conductivity was maintained at 77.5% IACS (International annealing copper standard), and when the conductivity was 80.2% IACS, the tensile strength was 600 MPa. The relative errors between the experimental and predicted values were <5%. Microstructure images of three experimental sample sets demonstrated that coarse second phases were present in the as-cast structure; however, these structures were dissolved and redistributed after the solid solution, cold deformation, and aging processes. The precipitated particles distributed along the grain boundary had low strength and conductivity. Our analysis revealed that the Mg and Ti elements were detrimental to the increase in strength, while Fe and Sn effectively increased strength. Additionally, Fe had a lower impact on conductivity than Sn. The results of this study demonstrate that the three optimized components identified can satisfy the performance requirements of interconnected frameworks in ultralarge-scale integrated circuits.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    謝建新, 宿彥京, 薛德禎, 等. 機器學習在材料研發中的應用. 金屬學報, 2021, 57(11):1343

    Xie J X, Su Y J, Xue D Z, et al. Machine learning for materials research and development. Acta Metall Sin, 2021, 57(11): 1343
    [2]
    Agrawal A, Choudhary A. Perspective: Materials informatics and big data: Realization of the “fourth paradigm” of science in materials science. APL Mater, 2016, 4(5): 053208 doi: 10.1063/1.4946894
    [3]
    Liu Y L, Niu C, Wang Z, et al. Machine learning in materials genome initiative: A review. J Mater Sci Technol, 2020, 57: 113 doi: 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.067
    [4]
    Hart G L W, Mueller T, Toher C, et al. Machine learning for alloys. Nat Rev Mater, 2021, 6(8): 730 doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00340-w
    [5]
    Chen C, Zuo Y X, Ye W K, et al. A critical review of machine learning of energy materials. Adv Energy Mater, 2020, 10(8): 1903242 doi: 10.1002/aenm.201903242
    [6]
    Raccuglia P, Elbert K C, Adler P D F, et al. Machine-learning-assisted materials discovery using failed experiments. Nature, 2016, 533(7601): 73 doi: 10.1038/nature17439
    [7]
    Janet J P, Chan L, Kulik H J. Accelerating chemical discovery with machine learning: Simulated evolution of spin crossover complexes with an artificial neural network. J Phys Chem Lett, 2018, 9(5): 1064 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00170
    [8]
    Torkamannia A, Omidi Y, Ferdousi R. A review of machine learning approaches for drug synergy prediction in cancer. Brief Bioinform, 2022, 23(3): bbac075 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac075
    [9]
    鄭偉達, 張惠然, 胡紅青, 等. 基于不同機器學習算法的鈣鈦礦材料性能預測. 中國有色金屬學報, 2019, 29(4):803

    Zheng W D, Zhang H R, Hu H Q, et al. Performance prediction of perovskite materials based on different machine learning algorithms. Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2019, 29(4): 803
    [10]
    Balachandran P V, Emery A A, Gubernatis J E, et al. Predictions of new ABO3 perovskite compounds by combining machine learning and density functional theory. Phys Rev Materials, 2018, 2(4): 043802 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.043802
    [11]
    She C L, Huang Q C, Chen C, et al. Machine learning-guided search for high-efficiency perovskite solar cells with doped electron transport layers. J Mater Chem A, 2021, 9(44): 25168 doi: 10.1039/D1TA08194B
    [12]
    Sun Y T, Bai H Y, Li M Z, et al. Machine learning approach for prediction and understanding of glass-forming ability. J Phys Chem Lett, 2017, 8(14): 3434 doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01046
    [13]
    Xiong J E, Zhang T Y, Shi S Q. Machine learning prediction of elastic properties and glass-forming ability of bulk metallic glasses. MRS Commun, 2019, 9(2): 576 doi: 10.1557/mrc.2019.44
    [14]
    徐燕, 張玉鳳, 高湉, 等. Al基非晶合金表征參數的支持向量回歸分析. 中國有色金屬學報, 2016, 26(4):836

    Xu Y, Zhang Y F, Gao T, et al. Parameters analysis of Al-based amorphous alloys using support vector regression. Chin J Nonferrous Met, 2016, 26(4): 836
    [15]
    王炯, 肖斌, 劉軼. 機器學習輔助的高通量實驗加速硬質高熵合金CoxCryTizMouWv成分設計. 中國材料進展, 2020, 39(4):269

    Wang J, Xiao B, Liu Y. Machine learning assisted high-throughput experiments accelerates the composition design of hard high-entropy alloy CoxCryTizMouWv. Mater China, 2020, 39(4): 269
    [16]
    Rao Z Y, Tung P Y, Xie R W, et al. Machine learning-enabled high-entropy alloy discovery. Science, 2022, 378(6615): 78 doi: 10.1126/science.abo4940
    [17]
    Klimenko D, Stepanov N, Li J A, et al. Machine learning-based strength prediction for refractory high-entropy alloys of the Al–Cr–Nb–Ti–V–Zr system. Materials, 2021, 14(23): 7213 doi: 10.3390/ma14237213
    [18]
    Wang C S, Fu H D, Jiang L, et al. A property-oriented design strategy for high performance copper alloys via machine learning. NPJ Comput Mater, 2019, 5: 87 doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0227-7
    [19]
    Zhang H T, Fu H D, He X Q, et al. Dramatically enhanced combination of ultimate tensile strength and electric conductivity of alloys via machine learning screening. Acta Mater, 2020, 200: 803 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.068
    [20]
    Wu S W, Zhou X G, Ren J K, et al. Optimal design of hot rolling process for C–Mn steel by combining industrial data-driven model and multi-objective optimization algorithm. J Iron Steel Res Int, 2018, 25(7): 700 doi: 10.1007/s42243-018-0101-8
    [21]
    邱華東, 田建艷, 王書宇, 等. 模糊神經網絡融合建模方法及其在軋制力控制中的應用. 中國冶金, 2021, 31(1):52

    Qiu H D, Tian J Y, Wang S Y, et al. Modeling method of fuzzy neural network and its application in rolling force control. China Metall, 2021, 31(1): 52
    [22]
    Asif K, Zhang L, Derrible S, et al. Machine learning model to predict welding quality using air-coupled acoustic emission and weld inputs. J Intell Manuf, 2022, 33(3): 881 doi: 10.1007/s10845-020-01667-x
    [23]
    Hart-Rawung T, Buhl J, Bambach M. A fast approach for optimization of hot stamping based on machine learning of phase transformation kinetics. Procedia Manuf, 2020, 47: 707 doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.218
    [24]
    宿彥京, 付華棟, 白洋, 等. 中國材料基因工程研究進展. 金屬學報, 2020, 56(10):1313

    Su Y J, Fu H D, Bai Y, et al. Progress in materials genome engineering in China. Acta Metall Sin, 2020, 56(10): 1313
    [25]
    Raissi M. Deep hidden physics models: Deep learning of nonlinear partial differential equations. J Mach Learn Res, 2018, 19: 1
    [26]
    Sun L N, Gao H, Pan S W, et al. Surrogate modeling for fluid flows based on physics-constrained deep learning without simulation data. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng, 2020, 361: 112732 doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112732
    [27]
    Sang L, Xu M, Qian S S, et al. Knowledge graph enhanced neural collaborative filtering with residual recurrent network. Neurocomputing, 2021, 454: 417 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.053
    [28]
    Chai X Q. Diagnosis method of thyroid disease combining knowledge graph and deep learning. IEEE Access, 2020, 8: 149787 doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3016676
    [29]
    Heaton J. The number of hidden layers [R/OL]. Heaton Research (2017-06-01) [2022-09-19]. https://www.heatonresearch.com/2017/06/01/hidden-layers.html
  • 加載中

Catalog

    通訊作者: 陳斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈陽化工大學材料科學與工程學院 沈陽 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度學術搜索
    3. 萬方數據庫搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(4)

    Article views (383) PDF downloads(61) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    久色视频