Damage and fracture behavior of a metal sheet under in-plane compression–shear deformation

QIAN Ling-yun; MA Teng-yun; AN Peng; JI Wan-ting; SUN Chao-yang

doi:10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.23.002

Volume 43 Issue 2

Feb. 2021

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Engineering > 2021 > 43(2): 263-272

QIAN Ling-yun, MA Teng-yun, AN Peng, JI Wan-ting, SUN Chao-yang. Damage and fracture behavior of a metal sheet under in-plane compression–shear deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2021, 43(2): 263-272. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.23.002

Citation:

QIAN Ling-yun, MA Teng-yun, AN Peng, JI Wan-ting, SUN Chao-yang. Damage and fracture behavior of a metal sheet under in-plane compression–shear deformation[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2021, 43(2): 263-272. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.23.002

Citation:

PDF( 1361 KB)

Damage and fracture behavior of a metal sheet under in-plane compression–shear deformation

doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2020.09.23.002

QIAN Ling-yun^{1, 2
,
,},
MA Teng-yun^{1, 2},
AN Peng^{1, 2},
JI Wan-ting^{1, 2},
SUN Chao-yang^{1, 2}

1.
School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Beijing Key Laboratory of Lightweight Metal Forming, Beijing 100083, China

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: qianly@ustb.edu.cn
Received Date: 2020-09-23
Publish Date: 2021-02-26

Abstract

Abstract

Increasing demands for lightweight manufacturing accelerate the application of lightweight materials in the transportation, aviation, and power industries. High-strength steel is a popular candidate among various lightweight materials. Transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) steel, a high-strength, lightweight steel, is promising for forming processes owing to its high strength and toughness. However, the increase in the flow strength of metals will create big challenges for material formability and fracture issues for manufacturing processes. Ductile fracture is still the main failure form during the forming process of TRIP steel. Sheet metal is subject to complex stress states when it undergoes diverse loading paths. Failure modes in metal forming can be mainly classified into the following: tensile, compression, shear, tensile–shear, and compression–shear. Because the metal sheet is prone to buckling failure when it undergoes in-plane compression–shear deformation, it is difficult to induce fracture during the corresponding negative stress triaxiality range. To solve this issue, a novel experimental setup and a specimen were designed to analyze fracture behaviors of an advanced high-strength steel TRIP800 sheet. For the same specimen, the failure behaviors of diverse stress states could be achieved by adjusting the angles between the loading direction and specimen positions. The parallel numerical simulations of in-plane compression–shear deformations under three typical loading angles of 20°, 30°, and 45° were performed on the ABAQUS/Explicit platform. The predicted stress triaxiality in the local deformation region of the three cases was less than zero, and the lowest was up to ?0.485, which verifies that the fracture failure analysis of negative stress triaxiality range could be realized with the designed device. In addition, the fracture onset information and damage evolution were analyzed based on the modified Mohr–Coulomb (MMC) fracture criterion. Furthermore, the fracture strain at the fracture point decreased with the decrease in stress triaxiality when the stress triaxiality was less than ?1/3.
- TRIP800,
- in-plane compression–shear,
- stress triaxiality,
- stress state,
- damage evolution

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	劉文華. 高強度鋼板在汽車輕量化中的應用研究[學位論文]. 武漢: 武漢理工大學, 2009. Liu W H. Research on Application of High Strength Steel in Automotive Lightweight [Dissertation]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Technology, 2009.
[2]	Chiang J, Lawrence B, Boyd J D, et al. Effect of microstructure on retained austenite stability and work hardening of TRIP steels. Mater Sci Eng A, 2011, 528(13-14): 4516 doi: 10.1016/j.msea.2011.02.032
[3]	Lou Y S, Huh H. Prediction of ductile fracture for advanced high strength steel with a new criterion: Experiments and simulation. J Mater Process Technol, 2013, 213(8): 1284 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.03.001
[4]	Li Y N, Luo M, Gerlach J, et al. Prediction of shear-induced fracture in sheet metal forming. J Mater Process Technol, 2010, 210(14): 1858 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.06.021
[5]	Choi K S, Liu W N, Sun X, et al. Microstructure-based constitutive modeling of TRIP steel: prediction of ductility and failure modes under different loading conditions. Acta Mater, 2009, 57(8): 2592 doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.02.020
[6]	Zhu H, Zhu L, Chen J H, et al. Investigation of fracture mechanism of 6063 aluminum alloy under different stress states. Int J Fract, 2007, 146(3): 159 doi: 10.1007/s10704-007-9158-2
[7]	Bao Y B, Wierzbicki T. On fracture locus in the equivalent strain and stress triaxiality space. Int J Mech Sci, 2004, 46(1): 81 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2004.02.006
[8]	Shouler D R, Allwood J M. Design and use of a novel sample design for formability testing in pure shear. J Mater Process Technol, 2010, 210(10): 1304 doi: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.03.019
[9]	穆磊, 臧勇, Araujo S P M. 一個基于孔洞演化機制的韌性斷裂預測模型. 工程科學學報, 2017, 39(4):557 Mu L, Zang Y, Araujo S P M. A micromechanically motivated uncoupled model for ductile fracture prediction. Chin J Eng, 2017, 39(4): 557
[10]	韓光照, 蔡力勛, 姚迪, 等. 延性材料斷裂準則與平面應變斷裂韌度. 航空學報, 2018, 39(8):145 Han G Z, Cai L X, Yao D, et al. Fracture criterion and plane-strain fracture toughness of ductile materials. Acta Aeron Astron Sin, 2018, 39(8): 145
[11]	賈哲, 穆磊, 臧勇. 金屬塑性成形中的韌性斷裂微觀機理及預測模型的研究進展. 工程科學學報, 2018, 40(12):1454 Jia Z, Mu L, Zang Y. Research progress on the micro-mechanism and prediction models of ductile fracture in metal forming. Chin J Eng, 2018, 40(12): 1454
[12]	Zhu Y Z, Kiran R, Xing J H, et al. A modified micromechanics framework to predict shear involved ductile fracture in structural steels at intermediate and low-stress triaxialities. Eng Fract Mech, 2020, 225: 106860 doi: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106860
[13]	Lou Y S, Yoon J W, Huh H. Modeling of shear ductile fracture considering a changeable cut-off value for stress triaxiality. Int J Plast, 2014, 54: 56
[14]	Kubík P, ?ebek F, H?lka J, et al. Calibration of ductile fracture criteria at negative stress triaxiality. Int J Mech Sci, 2016, 108-109: 90
[15]	李翀. 薄壁材料在塑性加工中的失穩現象分析與應用[學位論文]. 北京: 北京理工大學, 2017 Li C. Analysis and Application of the Instability of Thin-Walled Materials in Plastic Forming Process [Dissertation]. Beijing: Beijing Institute of Technology, 2017
[16]	黃光勝, 王利飛, 王艷霞, 等. 一種薄板材料壓縮輔助工具及使用方法: 中國專利, CN103335883A. 2013-10-02 Huang G S, Wang L F, Wang Y X, et al. An Auxiliary Tool for Thin Plate Material Compression and Its Application: China Patent, CN103335883A. 2013-10-02
[17]	Mohr D, Henn S. Calibration of stress-triaxiality dependent crack formation criteria: a new hybrid experimental–numerical method. Exp Mech, 2007, 47(6): 805 doi: 10.1007/s11340-007-9039-7
[18]	Brünig M, Gerke S, Schmidt M. Damage and failure at negative stress triaxialities: Experiments, modeling and numerical simulations. Int J Plast, 2018, 102: 70
[19]	Gerke S, Zistl M, Bhardwaj A, et al. Experiments with the X0-specimen on the effect of non-proportional loading paths on damage and fracture mechanisms in aluminum alloys. Int J Solids Struct, 2019, 163: 157 doi: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.01.007
[20]	徐芹所, 莊新村, 方勇勇, 等. 一種新的金屬板料雙向壓縮剪切試驗方法. 上海交通大學學報, 2015, 49(10):1510 Xu Q S, Zhuang X C, Fang Y Y, et al. A novel test method for symmetrical sheet metal compression-shear. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ, 2015, 49(10): 1510
[21]	吳彥駿, 莊新村, 趙震. 不同應力狀態下45鋼斷口形貌分析. 塑性工程學報, 2013, 20(3):106 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2012.2013.03.020 Wu Y J, Zhuang X C, Zhao Z. Fracture topography analysis of C45 steel under different stress states. J Plast Eng, 2013, 20(3): 106 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2012.2013.03.020
[22]	Wu H, Xu W C, Shan S B, et al. An extended GTN model for low stress triaxiality and application in spinning forming. J Mater Process Technol, 2019, 263: 112
[23]	Lou Y S, Yoon J W, Huh H, et al. Correlation of the maximum shear stress with micro-mechanisms of ductile fracture for metals with high strength-to-weight ratio. Int J Mech Sci, 2018, 146-147: 583 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.03.025
[24]	Hill R. A theory of the yielding and plastic flow of anisotropic metals. Proc R Soc Lond A, 1948, 193(1033): 281
[25]	Qian L Y, Fang G, Zeng P. Modeling of the ductile fracture during the sheet forming of aluminum alloy considering non-associated constitutive characteristic. Int J Mech Sci, 2017, 126: 55 doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.03.013
[26]	Reis L C, Prates P A, Oliveira M C, et al. Inverse identification of the Swift law parameters using the bulge test. Int J Mater Form, 2017, 10(4): 493 doi: 10.1007/s12289-016-1296-5
[27]	Bai Y L, Wierzbicki T. Application of extended Mohr–Coulomb criterion to ductile fracture. Int J Fract, 2010, 161(1): 1
[28]	Xue L. Damage accumulation and fracture initiation in uncracked ductile solids subject to triaxial loading. Int J Solids Struct, 2007, 44(16): 5163