Effect of uneven distribution of proppant in fracture network on exploitation dynamic characteristics

ZHU Wei-yao; ZHANG Qi-tao; YUE Ming; ZHANG Liao-yuan

doi:10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.23.001

Volume 42 Issue 10

Oct. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Engineering > 2020 > 42(10): 1318-1324

ZHU Wei-yao, ZHANG Qi-tao, YUE Ming, ZHANG Liao-yuan. Effect of uneven distribution of proppant in fracture network on exploitation dynamic characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1318-1324. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.23.001

Citation:

ZHU Wei-yao, ZHANG Qi-tao, YUE Ming, ZHANG Liao-yuan. Effect of uneven distribution of proppant in fracture network on exploitation dynamic characteristics[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1318-1324. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.23.001

Citation:

PDF( 1128 KB)

Effect of uneven distribution of proppant in fracture network on exploitation dynamic characteristics

doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.23.001

1.
School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
2.
Research Institute of Petroleum Engineering, Shengli Oilfield Company, Dongying 257000, China

More Information

Corresponding author: E-mail: weiyaook@sina.com
Received Date: 2019-10-23
Publish Date: 2020-10-25

Abstract

Abstract

Proppant injection during hydraulic fracturing is to prevent the closure of hydraulic fractures. As a result, the distribution of proppant in the fracture impact the productivity to a great extent. In order to study the rule of proppant transportation and distribution in complex fracture network, and the influence of uneven proppant distribution on the exploitation dynamic characteristics, a full-coupled 3D finite element method calculation model for tight oil reservoir considering sand injection during hydraulic fracturing was established, based on several mathematical models proposed by the author in the past. In the model, a mixture model was utilized, which had advantages to deal with two-phase flow containing solid particles in dispersed phase, to simulate the proppant transportation process in fracture networks. Then, a tight oil reservoir model was established to evaluate the effect of the proppant distribution on the reservoir performance. The calculation results show that in the fracture network, proppant particles will accumulate at the fracture intersection, and the proppant concentration is higher than other parts of the fracture network. The height of proppant settlement dune in the secondary fracture is 25%–50% lower than that in the main fracture, and the communication of secondary fractures has enhanced the proppant settlement degree. Moreover, factors like injection velocity, proppant materials and proppant size are proved to have a strong relation to the average conductivity of fracture network, which could impact the fracture design considerably. Furthermore, the uneven distribution of proppant in fracture network has a great influence on the simulation results. When the reservoir permeability reaches 0.05 mD, the calculation results show that the height, without considering the uneven distribution, of proppant settlement is 41.7% higher than the actual value. Therefore, the uneven distribution of proppant cannot be ignored in the simulation of low permeability reservoir. However, when the matrix permeability is 5 mD, the difference between the actual and simulated result will be within 5%. Thus, it is reasonable to neglect the uneven distribution of proppant in estimations.
- horizontal well,
- fracture network,
- proppant-laden fluid,
- numerical simulation,
- two phase flow

FullText(HTML)

References(28)

References

[1]	黃玉珍, 黃金亮, 葛春梅, 等. 技術進步是推動美國頁巖氣快速發展的關鍵. 天然氣工業, 2009, 29(5):7 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.05.002 Huang Y Z, Huang J L, Ge C M, et al. A key factor promoting rapid development of shale gas in America: technical progress. Nat Gas Ind, 2009, 29(5): 7 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.05.002
[2]	朱維耀, 岳明, 劉昀楓, 等. 中國致密油藏開發理論研究進展. 工程科學學報, 2019, 41(9):1103 Zhu W Y, Yue M, Liu Y F, et al. Research progress on tight oil exploration in China. Chin J Eng, 2019, 41(9): 1103
[3]	朱維耀, 馬東旭, 亓倩, 等. 復雜縫網頁巖壓裂水平井多區耦合產能分析. 天然氣工業, 2017, 37(7):60 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.009 Zhu W Y, Ma D X, Qi Q, et al. Multi-zone coupling productivity of horizontal well fracturing with complex fracture networks in shale gas reservoirs. Nat Gas Ind, 2017, 37(7): 60 doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.009
[4]	唐穎, 唐玄, 王廣源, 等. 頁巖氣開發水力壓裂技術綜述. 地質通報, 2011, 30(2-3):393 Tang Y, Tang X, Wang G Y, et al. Summary of hydraulic fracturing technology in shale gas development. Geol Bull China, 2011, 30(2-3): 393
[5]	劉德華, 肖佳林, 關富佳. 頁巖氣開發技術現狀及研究方向. 石油天然氣學報, 2011, 33(1):119 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2011.01.027 Liu D H, Xiao J L, Guan F J. Current situation and research direction of shale gas development. J Oil Gas Technol, 2011, 33(1): 119 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2011.01.027
[6]	Economides M J, Nolte K G. Reservoir Stimulation. Schlumerger Educational Services, 1989
[7]	Osiptsov A A. Fluid mechanics of hydraulic fracturing: a review. J Pet Sci Eng, 2017, 156: 513 doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.05.019
[8]	Patankar N A, Joseph D D, Wang J, et al. Power law correlations for sediment transport in pressure driven channel flows. Int J Multiphase Flow, 2002, 28(8): 1269 doi: 10.1016/S0301-9322(02)00030-7
[9]	Wen Q Z, Jin X C, Shah S N, et al. Experimental investigation of propped fracture network conductivity in naturally fractured shale reservoirs // SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. New Orleans, 2013: 166474
[10]	溫慶志, 翟恒立, 羅明良, 等. 頁巖氣藏壓裂支撐劑沉降及運移規律實驗研究. 油氣地質與采收率, 2012, 19(6):104 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2012.06.025 Wen Q Z, Zhai H L, Luo M L, et al. Study on proppant settlement and transport rule in shale gas fracturing. Petrol Geol Recovery Efficiency, 2012, 19(6): 104 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2012.06.025
[11]	溫慶志, 羅明良, 李加娜, 等. 壓裂支撐劑在裂縫中的沉降規律. 油氣地質與采收率, 2009, 16(3):100 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2009.03.033 Wen Q Z, Luo M L, Li J N, et al. Principle of proppant settlement in fracture. Pet Geol Recovery Efficiency, 2009, 16(3): 100 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2009.03.033
[12]	李劍輝, 朱維耀, 岳明, 等. 水平井壓裂單縫和多分支縫中攜砂液流動規律數值模擬. 科學技術與工程, 2018, 18(22):38 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.22.005 Li J H, Zhu W Y, Yue M, et al. Numerical simulation of proppant-laden fluid flow in single fracture and branch fractures of horizontal well. Sci Technol Eng, 2018, 18(22): 38 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2018.22.005
[13]	張潦源, 翟恒立, 盧娜娜, 等. 非牛頓壓裂液中支撐劑聚集沉降規律實驗研究. 科學技術與工程, 2013, 13(34):10142 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2013.34.007 Zhang L Y, Zhai H L, Lu N N, et al. Experimental study on proppant gathered settlement in non-Newtonian fracturing fluid. Sci Technol Eng, 2013, 13(34): 10142 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2013.34.007
[14]	Barree R D, Conway M W. Experimental and numerical modeling of convective proppant transport. J Pet Technol, 1995, 47(3): 28564
[15]	Cipolla C L, Warpinski N R, Mayerhofer M J. Hydraulic fracture complexity: diagnosis, remediation, and explotation // SPE Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition. Perth, 2008
[16]	Maxwell S C, Urbancic T I, Steinsberger N P, et al. Microseismic imaging of hydraulic fracture complexity in the barnett shale // SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. San Antonio, 2002
[17]	溫慶志, 段曉飛, 戰永平, 等. 支撐劑在復雜縫網中的沉降運移規律研究. 西安石油大學學報: 自然科學版, 2016, 31(1):79 Wen Q Z, Duan X F, Zhan Y P, et al. Study on settlement and migration law of proppant in complex fracture network. J Xi’an Shiyou Univ Nat Sci, 2016, 31(1): 79
[18]	李楊. 體積壓裂復雜縫網支撐劑沉降規律研究[學位論文]. 青島: 中國石油大學(華東), 2015 Li Y. Study on Proppants Settlement Law in Fracture Network of Volume Fracturing[Dissertation]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2015
[19]	Sahai R, Miskimins J L, Olson K E. Laboratory results of proppant transport in complex fracture systems // SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference. Woodlands, 2014: 35
[20]	朱維耀, 劉青, 岳明, 等. 考慮支撐劑裂縫導流能力計算及縫內支撐劑運移模擬. 石油與天然氣化工, 2019, 48(2):75 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2019.02.013 Zhu W Y, Liu Q, Yue M, et al. Calculation of fracture conductivity considering proppant influence and simulation of proppant transport in fracture. Chem Eng Oil Gas, 2019, 48(2): 75 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3426.2019.02.013
[21]	Liu W C, Zhang Q T, Zhu W Y. Numerical simulation of multi-stage fractured horizontal well in low-permeable oil reservoir with threshold pressure gradient with moving boundary. J Pet Sci Eng, 2019, 178: 1112 doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.033
[22]	Ishii M, Hibiki T. Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010
[23]	Wu Y L, Liu S H, Dou H S, et al. Simulations of unsteady cavitating turbulent flow in a Francis turbine using the RANS method and the improved mixture model of two-phase flows. Eng Comput, 2011, 27(3): 235 doi: 10.1007/s00366-010-0194-6
[24]	Aminfar H, Mohammadpourfard M, Mohseni F. Two-phase mixture model simulation of the hydro-thermal behavior of an electrical conductive ferrofluid in the presence of magnetic fields. J Magn Magn Mater, 2012, 324(5): 830 doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2011.09.028
[25]	Krieger I M, Dougherty T J. A mechanism for non-Newtonian flow in suspensions of rigid spheres. Trans Soc Rheol, 1959, 3: 137 doi: 10.1122/1.548848
[26]	Warren J E, Root P J. The behavior of naturally fractured reservoirs. Soc Pet Eng J, 1963, 3(03): 245 doi: 10.2118/426-PA
[27]	Mayerhofer M J, Lolon E, Warpinski N R, et al. What is stimulated reservoir volume. SPE Prod Oper, 2010, 25(1): 89
[28]	Kong B, Fathi E, Ameri S. Coupled 3-D numerical simulation of proppant distribution and hydraulic fracturing performance optimization in Marcellus shale reservoirs. Int J Coal Geol, 2015, 147-148: 35 doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2015.06.006