<listing id="l9bhj"><var id="l9bhj"></var></listing>
<var id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></var>
<menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></cite>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></cite>
<var id="l9bhj"></var><cite id="l9bhj"><video id="l9bhj"></video></cite>
<menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"><listing id="l9bhj"></listing></strike></cite><cite id="l9bhj"><span id="l9bhj"><menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem></span></cite>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></var>
<ins id="l9bhj"><span id="l9bhj"></span></ins>
Volume 28 Issue 3
Aug.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
SUN Gang, LI Mingzhe, CUI Xiangji, DENG Yushan. Influence of different technology modes on spring-back in multi-point forming[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2006, 28(3): 274-277. doi: 10.13374/j.issn1001-053x.2006.03.015
Citation: SUN Gang, LI Mingzhe, CUI Xiangji, DENG Yushan. Influence of different technology modes on spring-back in multi-point forming[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2006, 28(3): 274-277. doi: 10.13374/j.issn1001-053x.2006.03.015

Influence of different technology modes on spring-back in multi-point forming

doi: 10.13374/j.issn1001-053x.2006.03.015
  • Received Date: 2004-12-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2005-03-22
  • Available Online: 2021-08-24
  • Finite element method was used to numerically simulate spring-back in multi-point forming (MPF). By contrasting two forming modes of multi-point die (MPD) and multi-point press (MPP), the influence of different forming modes on spring-back was analyzed. Firstly figuration was simulated by explicit method, and then implicit method was imported to calculate the spring-back of the spherical parts of 1 mm and 2 mm in thickness. The results indicate that when forming a figuration piece of 400 mm in curvature and 1 mm in thickness by the MPD forming mode of 10×10 array without hold blank, its spring-back value is 1.22 mm up to the most. But under the same condition, the spring-back value only is 0.24 mm by MPP. Namely the spring-back value of a metal sheet by MPP is 1/5 that by MPD. Moreover the spring back value is approximately 0 when forming a spherical part of 2 mm in thickness by MPP. It is concluded that MPP is better for MPF than MPD, and spring back value is sharply reduced.

     

  • loading
  • 加載中

Catalog

    通訊作者: 陳斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈陽化工大學材料科學與工程學院 沈陽 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度學術搜索
    3. 萬方數據庫搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Article views (189) PDF downloads(7) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    久色视频