<listing id="l9bhj"><var id="l9bhj"></var></listing>
<var id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></var>
<menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></cite>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></cite>
<var id="l9bhj"></var><cite id="l9bhj"><video id="l9bhj"></video></cite>
<menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem>
<cite id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"><listing id="l9bhj"></listing></strike></cite><cite id="l9bhj"><span id="l9bhj"><menuitem id="l9bhj"></menuitem></span></cite>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"></var>
<var id="l9bhj"><strike id="l9bhj"></strike></var>
<ins id="l9bhj"><span id="l9bhj"></span></ins>
Volume 42 Issue 10
Oct.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHANG Yong-feng, LU Zhi-qiang. Remaining useful life prediction based on an integrated neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1372-1380. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.10.005
Citation: ZHANG Yong-feng, LU Zhi-qiang. Remaining useful life prediction based on an integrated neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2020, 42(10): 1372-1380. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.10.005

Remaining useful life prediction based on an integrated neural network

doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2019.10.10.005
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail: zhiqianglu@#edu.cn
  • Received Date: 2019-10-10
  • Publish Date: 2020-10-25
  • Unexpected failures and unscheduled maintenance activities of mechanical systems might incur considerable waste of resources and high investment costs. Thus, in recent years, prognostics and health management (PHM) has received a lot of attention because of its importance in maintenance cost reduction and machine fault prognostics. The remaining useful life (RUL) of machinery is defined as the length from the current time to the end of its useful life, which is the core technology of PHM. During the operation of machines and equipment, a large amount of data generated by different sensors in the system is collected using various methods. These data often characterize the health status of machinery to a certain extent. By applying the systematic approach to these data, valuable information for strategic decision-making can be obtained. However, traditional machine learning algorithms are usually not efficient enough to handle the complex and nonlinear characteristics of the system and deal with big data. With the rapid development of modern computational hardware and theory, deep learning algorithms show unique advantages in characterizing the system complexity and processing big data. Because of the low-accuracy prediction of the RUL of machines or equipment, a neural network integrating the one-dimensional convolutional neural network (1D CNN) and the bidirectional long short-term memory (BD-LSTM) was proposed. To extract the features of the time series and generate more training samples, the sliding window algorithm was used to process the data and the Kalman filter was applied to denoise the data. Then, the dataset was standardized and the RUL labels were set. Instead of artificial feature extraction, this study used 1D CNN to extract features from the data and discarded the pooling layer of CNN. The extracted high-dimensional features were inputted into the BD-LSTM for regression prediction, and the neural network was integrated by bagging to predict the RUL. Finally, the effectiveness and superiority of the model compared with the machine or deep learning model were verified using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration dataset. Results showed that the proposed model can more accurately predict the RUL than the machine or deep learning model.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    Uckun S, Goebel K, Lucas P J F. Standardizing research methods for prognostics // 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. Denver, 2008: 1
    [2]
    Tang D Y, Makis V, Jafari L, et al. Optimal maintenance policy and residual life estimation for a slowly degrading system subject to condition monitoring. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2015, 134: 198 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.10.015
    [3]
    Canizo M, Onieva E, Conde A, et al. Real-time predictive maintenance for wind turbines using Big Data frameworks // 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM). Dallas, 2017: 70
    [4]
    Lei Y G, Li N P, Gontarz S, et al. A model-based method for remaining useful life prediction of machinery. IEEE Trans Reliab, 2016, 65(3): 1314 doi: 10.1109/TR.2016.2570568
    [5]
    Si X S, Wang W B, Hu C H, et al. Remaining useful life estimation – A review on the statistical data driven approaches. Eur J Oper Res, 2011, 213(1): 1 doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.11.018
    [6]
    Liu Y C, Hu X F, Zhang W J. Remaining useful life prediction based on health index similarity. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2019, 185: 502 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2019.02.002
    [7]
    Long Y W, Luo H W, Zhi Y, et al. Remaining useful life estimation of solder joints using an ARMA model optimized by genetic algorithm // 2018 19th International Conference on Electronic Packaging Technology (ICEPT). Shanghai, 2018: 1108
    [8]
    Wu W, Hu J T, Zhang J L. Prognostics of machine health condition using an improved ARIMA-based prediction method // 2007 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications. Harbin, 2007: 1062
    [9]
    Zhou Y P, Huang M H. Lithium-ion batteries remaining useful life prediction based on a mixture of empirical mode decomposition and ARIMA model. Microelectron Reliab, 2016, 65: 265 doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2016.07.151
    [10]
    Tian Z G. An artificial neural network method for remaining useful life prediction of equipment subject to condition monitoring. J Intell Manuf, 2012, 23(2): 227 doi: 10.1007/s10845-009-0356-9
    [11]
    Mosallam A, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N. Data-driven prognostic method based on Bayesian approaches for direct remaining useful life prediction. J Intell Manuf, 2016, 27(5): 1037 doi: 10.1007/s10845-014-0933-4
    [12]
    Khelif R, Chebel-Morello B, Malinowski S, et al. Direct remaining useful life estimation based on support vector regression. IEEE Trans Ind Electron, 2017, 64(3): 2276 doi: 10.1109/TIE.2016.2623260
    [13]
    Miao Q, Xie L, Cui H J, et al. Remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery with unscented particle filter technique. Microelectron Reliab, 2013, 53(6): 805 doi: 10.1016/j.microrel.2012.12.004
    [14]
    Tobon-Mejia D A, Medjaher K, Zerhouni N, et al. A data-driven failure prognostics method based on mixture of Gaussians hidden Markov models. IEEE Trans Reliab, 2012, 61(2): 491 doi: 10.1109/TR.2012.2194177
    [15]
    Li Z X, Wu D Z, Hu C, et al. An ensemble learning-based prognostic approach with degradation-dependent weights for remaining useful life prediction. Reliab Eng Syst Saf, 2019, 184: 110 doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.12.016
    [16]
    Heimes F O. Recurrent neural networks for remaining useful life estimation // 2008 International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management. Denver, 2008: 1
    [17]
    Babu G S, Zhao P L, Li X L. Deep convolutional neural network based regression approach for estimation of remaining useful life // International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications. Dallas, 2016: 214
    [18]
    Yuan M, Wu Y T, Lin L. Fault diagnosis and remaining useful life estimation of aero engine using LSTM neural network // 2016 IEEE International Conference on Aircraft Utility Systems (AUS). Beijing, 2016: 135
    [19]
    Zhang Y Z, Xiong R, He H W, et al. Long short-term memory recurrent neural network for remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion batteries. IEEE Trans Veh Technol, 2018, 67(7): 5695 doi: 10.1109/TVT.2018.2805189
    [20]
    Ordó?ez C, Lasheras F S, Roca-Pardi?as J, et al. A hybrid ARIMA–SVM model for the study of the remaining useful life of aircraft engines. J Comput Appl Math, 2019, 346: 184 doi: 10.1016/j.cam.2018.07.008
    [21]
    Guo L, Li N P, Jia F, et al. A recurrent neural network based health indicator for remaining useful life prediction of bearings. Neurocomputing, 2017, 240: 98 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.045
    [22]
    Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput, 1997, 9(8): 1735 doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735
    [23]
    Wu Y T, Yuan M, Dong S P, et al. Remaining useful life estimation of engineered systems using vanilla LSTM neural networks. Neurocomputing, 2018, 275: 167 doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2017.05.063
    [24]
    Zheng S, Ristovski K, Farahat A, et al. Long short-term memory network for remaining useful life estimation // 2017 IEEE International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management (ICPHM). Dallas, 2017: 88
    [25]
    Zhang C, Lim P, Qin A K, et al. Multiobjective deep belief networks ensemble for remaining useful life estimation in prognostics. IEEE Trans Neural Networks Learn Syst, 2017, 28(10): 2306 doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2582798
    [26]
    Zhang J J, Wang P, Yan R Q, et al. Long short-term memory for machine remaining life prediction. J Manuf Syst, 2018, 48: 78 doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.05.011
  • 加載中

Catalog

    通訊作者: 陳斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈陽化工大學材料科學與工程學院 沈陽 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度學術搜索
    3. 萬方數據庫搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(13)  / Tables(2)

    Article views (4166) PDF downloads(227) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return
    久色视频