Mechanism and research progress of the bubble-particle attachment in flotation

WANG Chao; SUN Chun-bao; KOU Jue

doi:10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.12.001

Volume 40 Issue 12

Dec. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Engineering > 2018 > 40(12): 1423-1433

WANG Chao, SUN Chun-bao, KOU Jue. Mechanism and research progress of the bubble-particle attachment in flotation[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 1423-1433. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.12.001

Citation:

WANG Chao, SUN Chun-bao, KOU Jue. Mechanism and research progress of the bubble-particle attachment in flotation[J]. Chinese Journal of Engineering, 2018, 40(12): 1423-1433. doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.12.001

Citation:

PDF( 1508 KB)

Mechanism and research progress of the bubble-particle attachment in flotation

doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.12.001

Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education of China for High-efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China

Received Date: 2017-11-27

Abstract

Abstract

The interaction process between particles and bubbles can be classified as collision, attachment, and detachment; all three sub-processes determine the collection probability between particles and bubbles. Upon collision, the hydrophobic particles strongly attach to the rising air bubbles, which carry them to the surface, thereby overflowing the flotation cell in the collecting launder. Hydrophilic particles unattached to the rising air bubbles are left to settle at the bottom of the cell to be discharged. Whether the target mineral particles can attach to the rising air bubbles is the key to froth flotation. Therefore, studying bubble-particle attachment to improve the flotation efficiency is quite significant. The bubble-particle attachment probability model, EDLVO theory, force analysis of the bubble-particle aggregate, influence factors, and experimental progress of the bubble-particle attachment were systematically analyzed. Based on the methods of contact time, induction time, and energy barrier, the adhesion probability model was analyzed from the perspectives of dynamics and thermodynamics, and the effect of particle size, bubble size, particle hydrophobicity, particle surface roughness, and pH values on adhesion probability were explained. The force analysis of the bubble-particle aggregate under quiescent and turbulent conditions was conducted. Typically, there exist three types of attachment forces of the bubble-particle aggregate:capillary force, hydrostatic pressure force, and buoyancy force. The weight force is the only detachment force of the bubble-particle aggregate in the quiescent condition, but the vibration and centrifugal forces are also detachment forces in the turbulent condition. Many researchers have conducted substantial research on particle-bubble adhesion using advanced instruments and detection means, and have made several research achievements. However, because bubble-particle interaction is extremely complicated, the interaction conditions are simplified during experimental study. Therefore, the attachment process is not satisfactorily described by the available theory. Combined with practical application demands, a bubble-particle study should be conducted from a deeper and more comprehensive level.
- particle,
- flotation bubble,
- attachment,
- probability model,
- EDLVO,
- force analysis,
- influence factors

FullText(HTML)

References(80)

References

[1]	Drelich J, Miller J D. Improved flotation deinking of sorted office papers by flocculation of ink particles. Prog Pap Recycl, 2001, 11(1):38
[2]	Ejtemaei M, Gharabaghi M, Irannajad M. A review of zinc oxide mineral beneficiation using flotation method. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2014, 206:68
[3]	Aghazadeh S, Mousavinezhad S K, Gharabaghi M. Chemical and colloidal aspects of collectorless flotation behavior of sulfide and non-sulfide minerals. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2015, 225:203
[4]	Wu Z J, Wang X M, Liu H N, et al. Some physicochemical aspects of water-soluble mineral flotation. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2016, 235:190
[5]	Cai X L, Chen J Q, Liu M L, et al. Numerical studies on dynamic characteristics of oil-water separation in loop flotation column using a population balance model. Sep Purif Technol, 2017, 176:134
[6]	Vashisth S, Bennington C P J, Grace J R, et al. Column flotation deinking:state-of-the-art and opportunities. Resour, Conserv Recycl, 2011, 55(12):1154
[7]	Wang B, Peng Y J. The effect of saline water on mineral flotation-a critical review. Miner Eng, 2014, 66-68:13
[8]	Yoon R H, Soni G, Huang K, et al. Development of a turbulent flotation model from first principles and its validation. Int J Miner Process, 2016, 156:43
[9]	Nguyen A V, Schulze H J, Ralston J. Elementary steps in particle-bubble attachment. Int J Miner Process, 1997, 51(1-4):183
[10]	Jameson G J. Physical factors affecting recovery rates in flotation. Miner Sci Eng, 1977, 9(3):103
[11]	Schulze H J. Hydrodynamics of bubble-mineral particle collisions. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev, 1989, 5(1-4):43
[12]	Nguyen A V. Hydrodynamics of liquid flows around air bubbles in flotation:a review. Int J Miner Process, 1999, 56(1-4):165
[13]	Nguyen A V, Ralston J, Schulze H J. On modelling of bubbleparticle attachment probability in flotation. Int J Miner Process,1998, 53(4):225
[14]	Sutherland K L. Physical chemistry of flotation; kinetics of the flotation process. J Phys Chem, 1948, 52(2):394
[15]	Yoon R H, Mao L Q. Application of extended DLVO theory, IV:derivation of flotation rate equation from first principles. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1996, 181(2):613
[16]	Miettinen T, Ralston J, Fornasiero D. The limits of fine particle flotation. Miner Eng, 2010, 23(5):420
[17]	Dobby G S, Finch J A. Particle size dependence in flotation derived from a fundamental model of the capture process. Int J Miner Process, 1987, 21(3-4):241
[18]	Yoon R H, Luttrell G H. The effect of bubble size on fine particle flotation. Miner Process Extr Metall Rev, 1989, 5(1-4):101
[19]	Yoon R H. The role of hydrodynamic and surface forces in bubble-particle interaction. Int J Miner Process, 2000, 58(1-4):129
[20]	Dobby G S, Finch J A. A model of particle sliding time for flotation size bubbles. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1986, 109(2):493
[21]	Jowett A. Formation and disruption of particle-bubble aggregates in flotation.//Symposium on Fine Particles Processing. Las Vegas, 1980:720
[22]	Dai Z F, Fornasiero D, Ralston J. Particle-bubble attachment in mineral flotation. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1999, 217(1):70
[23]	Yoon R H, Yordan J L. Induction time measurements for the quartz-amine flotation system. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1991, 141(2):374
[24]	Scheludko A, Toshev B V, Bojadjiev D T. Attachment of particles to a liquid surface (capillary theory of flotation). J Chem Soc Faraday Trans 1, 1976, 72(4):2815
[25]	Derjaguin B, Landau L. Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Prog Surf Sci, 1993, 43(1-4):30
[26]	Verwey E J W. Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. J Phys Chem, 1947, 51(3):631
[27]	Nguyen A, Schulze H J. Colloidal Science of Flotation. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 2003
[28]	Boström M, Williams D R M, Ninham B W. Specific ion effects:why DLVO theory fails for biology and colloid systems. Phys Rev Lett, 2001, 87(16):168103-1
[29]	Christenson H K, Claesson P M. Direct measurements of the force between hydrophobic surfaces in water. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2001, 91(3):391
[30]	Attard P. Long-range attraction between hydrophobic surfaces. J Phys Chem, 1989, 93(17):6441
[31]	Yoon R H, Aksoy B S. Hydrophobic forces in thin water films stabilized by dodecylammonium chloride. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1999, 211(1):1
[32]	Grasso D, Subramaniam K, Butkus M, et al. A review of nonDLVO interactions in environmental colloidal systems. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol, 2002, 1(1):17
[33]	Piñeres J, Barraza J. Energy barrier of aggregates coal particlebubble through the extended DLVO theory. Int J Miner Process, 2011, 100(1-2):14
[34]	Yin W Z, Wang J Z. Effects of particle size and particle interactions on scheelite flotation. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2014, 24(11):3682
[35]	Hetzel F, Doner H E. Some colloidal properties of beidellite:comparison with low and high charge montmorillonites. Clays Clay Miner, 1993, 41(3):453
[36]	Lagaly G, Ziesmer S. Colloid chemistry of clay minerals:the coagulation of montmorillonite dispersions. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2003, 100-102:105
[37]	Chheda P, Grasso D, Van Oss C J. Impact of ozone on stability of montmorillonite suspensions. J Colloid Interface Sci, 1992, 153(1):226
[38]	Sharma P K, Rao K H. Adhesion of Paenibacillus polymyxa on chalcopyrite and pyrite:surface thermodynamics and extended DLVO theory. Colloids Surf B, 2003, 29(1):21
[39]	Gao Y, Evans G M, Wanless E J, et al. DEM simulation of single bubble flotation:implications for the hydrophobic force in particle-bubble interactions. Adv Powder Technol, 2014, 25(4):1177
[40]	Amirfazli A, Neumann A W. Status of the three-phase line tension:a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2004, 110(3):121
[41]	Chau T T, Bruckard W J, Koh P T L, et al. A review of factors that affect contact angle and implications for flotation practice. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2009, 150(2):106
[42]	Feng D X, Nguyen A V, Tong X. Effect of contact angle and contact angle hysteresis on the floatability of spheres at the air-water interface. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2017, 248:69
[43]	Cheng T W, Holtham P N. The particle detachment process in flotation. Miner Eng, 1995, 8(8):883
[44]	Gu G X, Xu Z H, Nandakumar K, et al. Effects of physical environment on induction time of air-bitumen attachment. Int J Miner Process, 2003, 69(1-4):235
[45]	Somasundaran P, Zhang L, Fuerstenau D W. The effect of environment, oxidation and dissolved metal species on the chemistry of coal flotation. Int J Miner Process, 2000, 58(1-4):85
[46]	Albijanic B, Bradshaw D J, Nguyen A V. The relationships between the bubble-particle attachment time, collector dosage and the mineralogy of a copper sulfide ore. Miner Eng, 2012, 36-38:309
[47]	Krasowska M, Malysa K. Wetting films in attachment of the colliding bubble. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2007, 134-135:138
[48]	Anfruns J F. Rate of capture of small particles in flotation. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect C, 1977, 86:9
[49]	Blake P, Ralston J. Controlled methylation of quartz particles. Colloids Surf, 1985, 15:101
[50]	Vieira A M, Peres A E C. The effect of amine type, pH, and size range in the flotation of quartz. Miner Eng, 2007, 20(10):1008
[51]	Verrelli D I, Koh P T L, Bruckard W J, et al. Variations in the induction period for particle-bubble attachment. Miner Eng, 2012, 36-38:219
[52]	Verrelli D I, Bruckard W J, Koh P T L, et al. Particle shape effects in flotation. Part 1:microscale experimental observations. Miner Eng, 2014, 58:80
[53]	Brabcová Z, Karapantsios T, Kostoglou M, et al. Bubble-particle collision interaction in flotation systems. Colloids Surf A, 2015, 473:95
[54]	Verrelli D I, Koh P T L, Nguyen A V. Particle-bubble interaction and attachment in flotation. Chem Eng Sci, 2011, 66(23):5910
[55]	Zawala J, Kosior D. Dynamics of dewetting and bubble attachment to rough hydrophobic surfaces-Measurements and modelling. Miner Eng, 2016, 85:112
[56]	Kosior D, Zawala J, Krasowska M, et al. Influence of n-octanol and α-terpineol on thin film stability and bubble attachment to hydrophobic surface. Phys Chem Chem Phys, 2013, 15(7):2586
[57]	Del Castillo L A, Ohnishi S, Carnie S L, et al. Variation of local surface properties of an air bubble in water caused by its interaction with another surface. Langmuir, 2016, 32(30):7671
[58]	Gui X H, Xing Y W, Rong G Q, et al. Interaction forces between coal and kaolinite particles measured by atomic force microscopy. Powder Technol, 2016, 301:349
[59]	Pan J N, Zhu H T, Hou Q L, et al. Macromolecular and pore structures of Chinese tectonically deformed coal studied by atomic force microscopy. Fuel, 2015, 139:94
[60]	Yu X K, Burnham N A, Tao M J. Surface microstructure of bitumen characterized by atomic force microscopy. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2015, 218:17
[61]	Yin X H, Gupta V, Du H, et al. Surface charge and wetting characteristics of layered silicate minerals. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2012, 179-182:43
[62]	Yan L J, Masliyah J H, Xu Z H. Understanding suspension rheology of anisotropically-charged platy minerals from direct interaction force measurement using AFM. Curr Opin Colloid Interface Sci, 2013, 18(2):149
[63]	Yang D Z, Xie L, Bobicki E, et al. Probing anisotropic surface properties and interaction forces of chrysotile rods by atomic force microscopy and rheology. Langmuir, 2014, 30(36):10809
[64]	Lu Z Z, Liu Q X, Xu Z H, et al. Probing anisotropic surface properties of molybdenite by direct force measurements. Langmuir, 2015, 31(42):11409
[65]	Rudolph M, Peuker U A. Mapping hydrophobicity combining AFM and Raman spectroscopy. Miner Eng, 2014, 66-68:181
[66]	Xing Y W, Gui X H, Cao Y J. Effect of calcium ion on coal flotation in the presence of kaolinite clay. Energy Fuels, 2016, 30(2):1517
[67]	Albijanic B, Ozdemir O, Hampton M A, et al. Fundamental aspects of bubble-particle attachment mechanism in flotation separation. Miner Eng, 2014, 65:187
[68]	Tabor R F, Grieser F, Dagastine R R, et al. Measurement and analysis of forces in bubble and droplet systems using AFM. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2012, 317(1):1
[69]	Ejtemaei M, Nguyen A V. A comparative study of the attachment of air bubbles onto sphalerite and pyrite surfaces activated by copper sulphate. Miner Eng, 2017, 109:14
[70]	Ejtemaei M, Nguyen A V. Kinetic studies of amyl xanthate adsorption and bubble attachment to Cu-activated sphalerite and pyrite surfaces. Miner Eng, 2017, 112:36
[71]	Sun W, Hu Y H, Dai J P, et al. Observation of fine particle aggregating behavior induced by high intensity conditioning using high speed CCD. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2006, 16(1):198
[72]	Ren L Y, Zhang Y M, Qin W Q, et al. Collision and attachment behavior between fine cassiterite particles and H₂ bubbles. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China, 2014, 24(2):520
[73]	Wang W X, Zhou Z A, Nandakumar K, et al. Attachment of individual particles to a stationary air bubble in model systems. Int J Miner Process, 2003, 68(1-4):47
[74]	Spyridopoulos M T, Simons S J R. Direct measurement of bubble-particle adhesion forces on the effects of particle hydrophobicity and surfactants. Chem Eng Res Des, 2004, 82(4):490
[75]	Xing Y W, Gui X H, Cao Y J. Effect of bubble size on bubbleparticle attachment and film drainage kinetics-A theoretical study. Powder Technol, 2017, 322:140
[76]	Nguyen A V, Evans G M. Attachment interaction between air bubbles and particles in froth flotation. Exp Therm Fluid Sci, 2004, 28(5):381
[77]	Feng D X, Nguyen A V. How does the Gibbs inequality condition affect the stability and detachment of floating spheres from the free surface of water? Langmuir, 2016, 32(8):1988
[78]	Feng D X, Nguyen A V. Contact angle variation on single floating spheres and its impact on the stability analysis of floating particles. Colloids Surf A, 2017, 520:442
[79]	Xu D, Ametov I, Grano S R. Detachment of coarse particles from oscillating bubbles-the effect of particle contact angle, shape and medium viscosity. Int J Miner Process, 2011, 101(1-4):50
[80]	Fosu S, Skinner W, Zanin M. Detachment of coarse composite sphalerite particles from bubbles in flotation:influence of xanthate collector type and concentration. Miner Eng, 2015, 71:73