鉻污染毒性土壤清潔修復研究進展與綜合評價

劉仕業; 岳昌盛; 彭犇; 邱桂博; 郭敏; 張梅

doi:10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.11.001

鉻污染毒性土壤清潔修復研究進展與綜合評價

doi: 10.13374/j.issn2095-9389.2018.11.001

劉仕業¹,
岳昌盛²,
彭犇²,
邱桂博²,
郭敏¹,
張梅^1, ,

1) 北京科技大學冶金生態與工程學院, 北京 100083;
2) 中冶建筑研究總院有限公司, 北京 100088

基金項目:

國家自然科學基金資助項目(51372019,51572020)

鋼鐵工業環境保護國家重點實驗室開放基金資助項目

詳細信息

中圖分類號: X-1;X53
計量
- 文章訪問數: 1631
- HTML全文瀏覽量: 460
- PDF下載量: 48
- 被引次數: 0
出版歷程
- 收稿日期: 2017-10-17

Research progress on remediation technologies of chromium-contaminated soil: a review

1) School of Metallurgical and Ecological Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China;
2) Central Research Institute of Building and Construction Co., Ltd., MCC Group, Beijing 100088, China

摘要

摘要: 綜述了土壤中鉻的來源,土壤中鉻的賦存形式及其提取方法,國內外鉻污染土壤修復技術研究動態,探討了鉻污染土壤修復的發展方向,并對現階段主要的修復技術,諸如客土法、稀釋法、固定化和穩定化、化學還原、土壤淋洗、電動修復、生物修復等進行了詳細介紹,進而對各種修復方法的優缺點進行了對比、歸納和評價,針對不同特點、性質的鉻污染土壤給出修復方法的建議,為清潔高效修復鉻污染土壤提供參考.
- 鉻 /
- 污染土壤 /
- 賦存形態 /
- 修復技術 /
- 六價鉻
Abstract: With the rapid economic development in China, more areas of industrial contaminated soil has been left unused because of industrial relocation or environmental protection. Considering the chromium (salt) industrial wasteland, the area of chromium-contaminated soil caused by the accumulation of chromium slag has reached 5 million square meters, and its direct utilization can result in health hazards to the public and threaten the environment. Therefore, it is of great practical significance to carry out research on economic, efficient, and clean methods for chromium-contaminated soil remediation. In this paper, the origin and occurrence of the chromium in soil, their extraction methods, and the research progress of chromium-contaminated soil in and outside China were reviewed. First, the occurrence of the chromium in soil was discussed. It is found that Cr exists predominantly in Cr(Ⅲ) and Cr(Ⅵ) oxidation states, whereby Cr(Ⅲ) is the more stable; under most prevailing environmental conditions Cr(Ⅵ) is rapidly reduced to Cr(Ⅲ). The methods of extracting chromium from soil were presented, including Tessier sequential extraction procedure and the European Community Bureau of Reference(BCR) three-step sequential extraction procedure, and then the two continuous extraction methods were compared and evaluated. Afterward, the remediation techniques of chromium-contaminated soil were systematically reviewed, including engineering physical repair methods, dilution methods, immobilization and stabilization, chemical reduction, electrokinetics repair, and bioremediation. The advantages and disadvantages of the various remediation techniques were compared, summarized, and evaluated. The developments of chromium-contaminated soil remediation technologies in the future were also explored, including the clean remediation technologies, combination of several remediation technologies, and novel nano-remediation materials. Accordingly, suggestions for the remediation of different chromium-contaminated soils were presented, which can provide references for clean and efficient remediation of chromium-contaminated soils.
- chromium /
- soil contamination /
- occurrence /
- remediation /
- hexavalent chromium

HTML全文

參考文獻(41)

[4]	Adam V, Quaranta G, Loyaux-Lawniczak S. Terrestrial and aquatic ecotoxicity assessment of Cr (VI) by the ReCiPe method calculation (LCIA):application on an old industrial contaminated site. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2013, 20(5):3312
[5]	Rai V, Mehrotra S. Chromium-induced changes in ultramorphology and secondary metabolites of Phyllanthus amarus, Schum&Thonn.-an hepatoprotective plant. Environ Monit Assess, 2008, 147(1-3):307
[6]	Dotaniya M L, Thakur J K, Meena V D, et al. Chromium pollution:a threat to environment——a review. Agric Rev, 2014, 35(2):153
[7]	Stout M D, Herbert R A, Kissling G E, et al. Hexavalent chromium is carcinogenic to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice after chronic oral exposure. Environ Health Perspect, 2009, 117(5):716
[11]	Wu C L, Zhang H, He P J, et al. Thermal stabilization of chromium slag by sewage sludge:effects of sludge quantity and temperature. J Environ Sci, 2010, 22(7):1110
[14]	Mǎrcuş M I, Vlad M, Mîţiu A M. Influence of different galvanic sludge types on the extraction efficiency of chromium ions. Adv Mater Res, 2017, 1143:108
[15]	Hu L G, Cai Y, Jiang G B. Occurrence and speciation of polymeric chromium (Ⅲ), monomeric chromium (Ⅲ) and chromium (Ⅵ) in environmental samples. Chemosphere, 2016, 156:14
[17]	Tessier A, Campbell P G C, Bisson M. Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem, 1979, 51(7):844
[18]	Rauret G, López-Sánchez J F, Sahuquillo A, et al. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. J Environ Monit, 1999, 1(1):57
[19]	Kartal S, Aydin Z, Tokalioğlu S. Fractionation of metals in street sediment samples by using the BCR sequential extraction procedure and multivariate statistical elucidation of the data. J Hazard Mater, 2006, 132(1):80
[20]	Mulligan C N, Yong R N, Gibbs B F. Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater:an evaluation. Eng Geol, 2001, 60(1-4):193
[21]	Allan M L, Kukacka L E. Blast furnace slag-modified grouts for in situ, stabilization of chromium-contaminated soil. Waste Manage, 1995, 15(3):193
[22]	Huang X, Zhuang R L, Muhammad F, et al. Solidification/stabilization of chromite ore processing residue using alkali-activated composite cementitious materials. Chemosphere, 2017, 168:300
[23]	Meegoda J N, Partymiller K, Richards M K, et al. Remediation of chromium-contaminated soils-pilot-scale investigation. Practice Periodical Hazard Toxic Radioactive Waste Manage, 2000, 4(1):7
[24]	Blowes D W, Ptacek C J, Jambor J L. In-situ remediation of Cr (VI)-contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive walls:laboratory studies. Environ Sci Technol, 1997, 31(12):3348
[25]	Fonseca B, Pazos M, Tavares T, et al. Removal of hexavalent chromium of contaminated soil by coupling electrokinetic remediation and permeable reactive biobarriers. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 2012, 19(5):1800
[26]	Seaman J C, Bertsch P M, Schwallie L. In situ Cr (Ⅵ) reduction within coarse-textured, oxide-coated soil and aquifer systems using Fe (Ⅱ) solutions. Environ Sci Technol, 1999, 33(6):938
[27]	Khan F A, Puts R W. In situ abiotic detoxification and immobilization of hexavalent chromium. Ground Water Monit Rem, 2003, 23(1):77
[29]	James B R. Remediation-by-reduction strategies for chromate-contaminated soils. Environ Geochem Health, 2001, 23(3):175
[31]	Xiao F, Chen D F, Luo L, et al. Time-order effects of vitamin C on hexavalent chromium-induced mitochondrial damage and DNA-protein crosslinks in cultured rat peripheral blood lymphocytes. Mol Med Rep, 2013, 8(1):53
[33]	Higgins T E, Halloran A R, Dobbins M E, et al. In situ reduction of hexavalent chromium in alkaline soils enriched with chromite ore processing residue. J Air Waste Manage Assoc, 1998, 48(11):1100
[35]	Di Palma L, Mancini D, Petrucci E. Experimental assessment of chromium mobilization from polluted soil by washing. Chem Eng Trans, 2012, 28:145
[36]	Gitipour S, Ahmadi S, Madadian E, et al. Soil washing of chromium-and cadmium-contaminated sludge using acids and ethylenediaminetetra acetic acid chelating agent. Environ Technol, 2016, 37(1):145
[37]	Wang Y, Fang Z Q, Liang B, et al. Remediation of hexavalent chromium contaminated soil by stabilized nanoscale zero-valent iron prepared from steel pickling waste liquor. Chem Eng J, 2014, 247:283
[38]	Chrysochoou M, Ferreira D R, Johnston C P. Calcium polysulfide treatment of Cr (VI)-contaminated soil. J Hazard Mater, 2010, 179(1-3):650
[39]	Paria S. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of organic contaminated soil and water. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2008, 138(1):24
[41]	Hong K J, Tokunaga S, Ishigami Y, et al. Extraction of heavy metals from MSW incinerator fly ash using saponins. Chemosphere, 2000, 41(3):345
[42]	Jean L, Bordas F, Gautier-Moussard C, et al. Effect of citric acid and EDTA on chromium and nickel uptake and translocation by Datura innoxia. Environ Pollut, 2008, 153(3):555
[43]	Hartley N R, Tsang D C W, Olds W E, et al. Soil washing enhanced by humic substances and biodegradable chelating agents. Soil Sediment Contam, 2014, 23(6):599
[44]	Lu P, Feng Q Y, Meng Q J, et al. Electrokinetic remediation of chromium-and cadmium-contaminated soil from abandoned industrial site. Sep Purif Technol, 2012, 98:216
[45]	Maturi K, Reddy K R, Cameselle C. Surfactant-enhanced electrokinetic remediation of mixed contamination in low permeability soil. Sep Sci Technol, 2009, 44(10):2385
[46]	Gent D B, Bricka R M, Alshawabkeh A N, et al. Bench-and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. J Hazard Mater, 2004, 110(1-3):53
[47]	Sanjay K, Arora A, Shekhar R, et al. Electroremediation of Cr (VI) contaminated soils:kinetics and energy efficiency. Colloids Surf A:Physicochem Eng Aspects, 2003, 222(1-3):253
[52]	Baker A J M, Brooks R R. Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements:a review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery, 1989, 1(2):81
[53]	Raskin I, Ensley B D. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals:Using Plants to Clean up the Environment. New York:John Wiley&Sons, Inc, 2000
[54]	Zhang X H, Liu J, Huang H T, et al. Chromium accumulation by the hyperaccumulator plant Leersia hexandra Swartz. Chemosphere, 2007, 67(6):1138
[59]	Srivastava S, Thakur I S. Evaluation of bioremediation and detoxification potentiality of Aspergillus niger for removal of hexavalent chromium in soil microcosm. Soil Biol Biochem, 2006, 38(7):1904
[60]	Tseng J K, Bielefeldt A R. Low-temperature chromium (VI) biotransformation in soil with varying electron acceptors. J Environ Qual, 2002, 31(6):1831
[62]	Vankar P S, Bajpaia D. Phytoremediation of chrome-VI of tannery effluent by Trichoderma species. Desalination, 2008, 222(1-3):255
[63]	Wang D F, Zhang G L, Zhou L L, et al. Synthesis of a multifunctional graphene oxide-based magnetic nanocomposite for efficient removal of Cr (VI). Langmuir, 2017, 33(28):7007
[64]	Baig U, Rao R A K, Khan A A, et al. Removal of carcinogenic hexavalent chromium from aqueous solutions using newly synthesized and characterized polypyrrole-titanium (IV) phosphate nanocomposite. Chem Eng J, 2015, 280:494