Localized corrosion resistance of 409 L and 430 ferritic stainless steels
-
摘要: 采用電化學測試技術與化學浸泡實驗相結合,對比研究了409L和430鐵素體不銹鋼熱軋板材耐點蝕和耐晶間腐蝕的能力.結果表明:409L不銹鋼的擊穿電位與保護電位的差小、鈍化膜的修復能力較強,表現為小尺度的淺點蝕孔;430不銹鋼的擊穿電位較高,耐點蝕能力高于409L不銹鋼,但430不銹鋼熱軋態的條帶組織有明顯的腐蝕微電池效應,表現為比較嚴重的全面腐蝕;409L不銹鋼含Cr量低,且其熱軋態未經過穩定化處理,使得409L不銹鋼耐晶間腐蝕能力劣于430不銹鋼.經微觀分析:409L不銹鋼為沿著基體等軸晶界的典型晶間腐蝕形貌特征,而430不銹鋼在軋向碳化物(M23C6)與基體的相界面上呈現分層腐蝕痕跡.Abstract: The pitting corrosion and intergranular corrosion resistance performances of 409 L and 430 hot-rolling plates were contrastively investigated by using electrochemical measurements and chemical immersion tests.The results show that the difference between breakdown potential and protection potential of 409 L stainless steel is little,and the restorability of the passive film is strong with small-scale shallow pits.The pitting corrosion resistance of 430 stainless steel is better than that of 409 L stainless steel because of a higher breakdown potential,but its banding microstructure has the apparent effect of a corrosion microcell,represented with a more serious general corrosion.The intergranular corrosion resistance of 409 L stainless steel performs worse than that of the 430 stainless steel because of the low content of Cr and the lack of stabilizing processes under the hot-rolled condition.Through microstructure analysis,409 L stainless steel presents a classic intergranular corrosion appearance along equiaxial grain boundaries,while 430 stainless steel exhibits a delamination corrosion trace at the phase interface between carbides(M23C6) and the matrix.
-
Key words:
- stainless steel /
- corrosion /
- pitting /
- anodic polarization /
- electrochemical properties
-

計量
- 文章訪問數: 319
- HTML全文瀏覽量: 85
- PDF下載量: 11
- 被引次數: 0